Quantcast
Channel: S M Ong
Viewing all 691 articles
Browse latest View live

Teetotaller: Liquor Control Bill? What Liquor Control Bill?

$
0
0


Yum seng!

Wait, is it past 10.30pm? Are we in a public place?

No problem. We can drink in the morning after 7am on the way to work on the train.

Aiyah! No drinking allowed on the train.

Wait, why do I care?

The new proposed curbs won’t affect me. I have a built-in 24-hour biological curb — whenever I drink alcohol, I break out in hives.

And it doesn’t matter if I’m nowhere near Geylang or Little India.

Yes, I’m allergic to alcohol — but even if I weren’t, I would still be a teetotaller.

I just never acquired the taste.

I’ve got straight edge.



So if Bill Cosby wants to get into my pants, he has to spike my teh terik.

Or just ask. I’m easy.

But to all you drinkers dismayed by the Liquor Control Bill, instead of drowning your sorrows in the bottle, why not go the other way and quit drinking altogether?

That'll show 'em.

You can take this as an opportunity to turn away the devil’s water and discover the joys of teetotalism like I have.

And I’m not alone. Iron Man star Robert Downey Jr, football idol Cristiano Ronaldo and supermodel Naomi Campbell are all on the wagon.

And supposedly, so was Adolf Hitler, but let’s not hold that against teetotalism.

So come to the dry side — heil, abstinence!

If the folks at Singtel had laid off the hooch, they might not have hired Phua Chu Kang to create their much-criticised, ungrammatical new slogan, “Let’s make everyday better.” Red faces all around at Singapore’s biggest telco and not just from inebriation.

But I understand that for many, it’s difficult to say no to the joy juice — I mean, where is the alcohol equivalent to the nicotine patch?

But you know what they say, when life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And when life takes away the alcohol, make a Shirley Temple.



But beyond just the buzz, alcohol is also a vital social lubricant. It’s easier to make friends with a drink or two.

I, too, have succumbed to peer pressure and even broken the law because of alcohol despite my abstinence.

This happened many years ago when I was living in America.

Like many Singaporeans, I grew up watching US movies and TV shows, but when I first went to the States to study, it was still a bit of a culture shock. And it’s not just how much cheese they eat.



Despite what you may see in a Madonna video, Americans are surprisingly conservative about a lot of things, particularly booze. Remember Prohibition?

That’s history, but they now have something called the open container law, which makes it illegal for you to walk down the street (or drive a car) with an open can of beer.

You don’t even have to be drinking it. But then what are you doing with an open can of beer if you aren’t drinking it?

No one warned me about this law.



I once went to an off-campus kegger, which is a party where beer is dispensed from a small barrel or keg.

Why did I go to a kegger even though I don’t drink? Because being a stranger in a strange land, I was desperate to make friends.

Someone offered me beer in a plastic cup. I accepted it to fit in — it was a kegger after all — but I didn’t drink it. Since I didn’t know any better, I walked back to my dorm with the cup, hoping to give the beer to someone else and make more friends.

After finding out about the law, I wondered whether I could’ve been arrested that night if a patrolling cop had spotted me with my “open container”.



Another indication of how uptight Americans are about alcohol is the drinking age, which is 21 compared to 18 in Singapore.

Because I went to college after my full-time national service, I was already 22 at the time, but most of my fellow freshmen were only 18.

Underage drinking is rampant in US colleges and on at least one occasion, I facilitated it — I bought alcohol for a minor or two at their behest because I wanted to be their friend.



So despite not touching the stuff, I could’ve already committed two alcohol-related offences. I hope the statutes of limitation have run out and I won't be extradited.

But I’ve learnt my lesson and stopped relying on booze to make friends. That’s why I don’t have many friends in spite of my sparkling poisonality.

But once you convert to teetotalism, you won’t need drinking buddies any more. And they will certainly have no use for you.

That’s when you learn who your true friends are.

Plus the money you save from not drinking will help pay for the increase in public transport fares.

And you can thank the Liquor Control Bill for that.

Cheers!

- Published in The New Paper, 25 January 2015


I just discovered the toy collectors' paradise at China Square Central

$
0
0
I never thought of myself as a toy collector, but I may just be in denial.

I started hanging around the toy shops in Plaza Singapura and Bugis Junction with my daughter after she got into Marvel comics and Dr Who.

I may have also been influenced by a few of my toy-collecting colleagues (all male, of course), who display their collection on their desk like an exhibit.

A photo posted by SM Ong (@sm_ong) on

I have bought toys for my family and my colleagues as presents. I have bought McDonald's Hello Kitty toys for myself as a joke.

A photo posted by SM Ong (@sm_ong) on

But lately, I've been buying more and more toy collectibles for keepsake, from the Sharknado Funko Pop vinyl figure to the Lotus Esprit car from The Spy Who Loved Me.

A photo posted by SM Ong (@sm_ong) on

A photo posted by SM Ong (@sm_ong) on

Does that make me a collector?

The answer may lie in how thrilled I was to discover the toy collectors' paradise at China Square Central yesterday.

How come I didn't know about this place before? Did you?

I just happened to be there to meet an old diver friend from the navy, Stewart, whom I hadn't seen in years. He had rented a stall in China Square to sell his collection of toys, DVDs and music books at the weekly flea market.



After my reunion with Stewart, I walked around the building and was astounded to find the number of toy shops there.

On top of that, half of the flea market were also selling toys. The other half were selling vintage stuff like old watches, phones and postcards. Some of the toys are old too.

Here's a bunch of photos I took with my Narrative Clip.


By the time we left the building, my daughter got a Captain American T-shirt ($28) and a deck of Captain America cards ($2) ...



My wife got this naked headless doll ($30)...



And I got this Alfred E Neuman as Green Lantern action figure, which Stewart gave me for free (thanks, man)...



This Hot Wheels Flintstones car for $4...



And from a flea market seller, Greedo ($10, no box) of Star Wars.



He shot first.

I may be going back to China Square next Sunday. Stewart promised me Wham's Last Christmas single on vinyl.



No, I'm not going to start collecting vinyl too. I think.

You goat to be kidding me: Oh sheep! It's the year of the goat puns

$
0
0
There has been some controversy over whether it should be the year of the goat or the year of the sheep.

But a more pressing issue is: How many goat puns can we tahan before the Government introduces a Goat Pun Control Bill in Parliament?

It's getting really baaaaaa-d. This has goat to stop.

But if you can't bleat them...



















A Christmas card in January

$
0
0
I rarely check my work mailbox (as in a physical mailbox, not e-mail inbox) because I rarely get any snail mail at work.

Yesterday, a colleague noticed something in my mailbox and I found this, a Christmas card date-stamped Dec 15, 2014.



It's from Ms Zaibun Siraj, a former Aware president (1996–1998), who has written to me before.

It was after I mentioned her in my column about the boisterous Aware EGM in 2009, where I said that with her "retro-futuristic purple streak in her hair" and matching outfit, she looked like the Joker.



But I didn't get her snail mail until months after she sent it to The New Paper because, as explained above, I rarely check my work mailbox.

And now, six years later, it has happened again.

In the Christmas card, she wrote some very nice things and I wish I had seen it earlier.



So either she has to start using e-mail or I should check my mailbox more often.

Thank you, Zaibun.

And, uh, merry Christmas to you too.

Joanne Peh & Qi Yuwu expecting their first child: Twitter reacts

$
0
0






















EARLIER: Here are a few choice tweets about the Joanne Peh-Qi Yuwu wedding

Don't learn CPR from this video

$
0
0
There's a video going round of a man doing chest compressions on another man, who appears to be unconscious.




According to a witness:
I was at Woodlands Drive 64 when I saw a jogger in his 40s suddenly collapse on the ground and a helpful passerby immediately started doing CPR for him.
I know some are criticising the less-than-urgent response of the SCDF personnel at the end of the video, but I'm more concerned that the "helpful passerby" was not performing the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correctly. I say this as a medic during national service who was trained in CPR, although I have never performed CPR on an actual person.

It has always bothered me that the CPR we often see in movies and TV shows is not what I was taught.



I wonder if that was where the passerby learnt his "CPR" from. Let's look at the video.

The first thing he does is check the casualty's pulse on the neck. That's correct.

The camera pans away and then back, showing the rescuer doing chest compressions on the casualty - over 90 times non-stop! That doesn't seem right.

He then turns to look at the arriving ambulance and does one or two compressions with ONE HAND! That is definitely wrong.

But technique aside, the biggest problem I have with the video is that it didn't show the rescuer doing any ventilation (or mouth-to-mouth resuscitation) at all.

CPR should be a combination of rescue breathing and chest compressions.



Yes, I'm aware there is something called hands-only CPR, but I wasn't taught that as a medic. And I believe, neither was the passerby. (See correction below.)

Nevertheless, the passerby should be commended for at least doing something instead of just gawking like the other onlookers. This is why everyone should be properly trained in CPR.

Ironically, two years ago, 7,204 people broke the world record for Singapore for being the largest group of people to be trained and certified in CPR at a single event.



I guess the passerby wasn't one of them.

UPDATE: According to SCDF, the passerby was an off-duty SCDF paramedic, which means he should be trained in CPR. He could be doing the hands-only version.






CORRECTION: It seems my CPR training is seriously outdated since I RODed nine years aago. 

The latest guidelines by the American Heart Association prioritise chest compressions and recommend hands-only CPR, doing away with rescue breathing.



It's also called continuous-chest-compression CPR, and sometimes cardio-cerebral resuscitation or CCR, not to be confused with Creedence Clearwater Revival






Take me to Church: Never mind Serina Wee, look at Sharon Tan!

$
0
0


Maybe it's just me.

I know everyone's hung up on Serina Wee, but it seems to me that her fellow accused, Sharon Tan, is getting hotter and hotter as the City Harvest Church trial drags on.

June 2012



August 2013



January 2014



August 2014




September 2014






October 2014



January 2015





What happened to Joanne Peh?

$
0
0
I suppose you’ve heard the big Joanne Peh news by now.

I, too, was caught by surprise like everyone else although in retrospect, I should’ve seen it coming.

I am, of course, talking about the actress leaving the Channel 5 drama series Code Of Law.

What a shocker.

I mean, there was no announcement that Peh was fleeing the local Law & Order rip-off, which she has been the star of since the show’s 2012 debut.



Then last week, on the fourth episode of the third season, she wasn't there any more. I found out about it on Twitter.


Sure, Keagan Kang, the other star of Code Of Law, is still on the show and is even prettier than Peh, but he’s no Mrs Qi Yuwu.

He’s more like Bobby Tonelli Light.

So what happened to Peh?

Was she killed off? Is she coming back?

Did I miss something in the previous episode?

Oh, yah, I did because I don’t watch Code Of Law at all.

Or Channel 5.

Or TV.

But I do watch YouTube.

So Channel 5 has helpfully uploaded on YouTube the Code Of Law episode that Peh last appeared in just so I can find out what happened to her.



No other full episode was uploaded on YouTube. Just that one.

Why? Because Channel 5 knows that there are many people like me who want to know what the hell happened to Peh and can’t be bothered to go to XinMSN where you can stream all the recent episodes for free.

The good thing about YouTube is that with a click of the mouse, you can easily forgo the 45 minutes of American-accented melodrama and skip to the American-accented melodrama at the end where Peh’s character explains why she’s abandoning ship.

The scene starts with Kang as lawyer Jacob Fernandez walking in on Peh packing her stuff and, speaking for all the viewers, he asks her: “So you’re really leaving?”

And she replies: “No, Mr Fernandez, I just really like putting files in boxes.”

LOL! Someone should cast Peh in the next Ghostbusters movie.



Then she added: “Actually, Sanjay would like to call it an indefinite leave of absence.”

I think Sanjay is their boss at the law firm. Like I said, I don’t watch the show.

So they didn’t kill her off. Peh’s character is going on “an indefinite leave of absence”.

Does that mean she may return?

For the answer to that, I turned to the source for all my Joanne Peh-related information, the Instagram of Jollity Club, “the one and only official Singapore-based fanclub for Joanne Peh”.

The club posted on Jan 28: “Please note that Joanne will not be making an appearance in future episodes of Code of Law 3.”



Oh. So she’s really gone – at least for the season.

I wonder what could’ve caused Peh’s sudden departure from the show.

Perhaps it’s because of her role in the upcoming movie, 1965? Who knows?

I can’t think of anything else? Can you?

Anyhoo, moving on.



Also last week, Laneway Festival became Lay Waste Festival after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong highlighted the trash left behind by the...

WHY ARE YOU INTERRUPTING ME?

What do you mean Joanne Peh is pregnant?

Didn’t she just marry Qi Yuwu?



They announced her pregnancy last week?

Whoa. That’s big news.

Am I the only person in the whole world who doesn’t know?

This is what happens when I don’t check the Jollity Club Instagram for a couple of days.

Why didn’t you tell me earlier instead of letting me go on and on like a fool about Code Of Law? Who cares about Code Of Law?

Now I feel so stupid.

Does Bobby Tonelli know?

Do reporters still go to him for quotes every time something happens to Peh?

Once Joanne Peh’s boyfriend, always Joanne Peh’s ex-boyfriend.

When she married Qi last September after breaking up with Tonelli, it was as if to prove how wrong I was to suggest in an earlier column that her relationship with Qi wasn’t real.

I admitted I was wrong in another column and pleaded for them to stop rubbing it in my face.

And here they are, rubbing it in my face again.

I wish I could go on an indefinite leave of absence from them – and all celebrity pregnancies.

Didn’t we just go through one last year with Fann Wong?



Wong was 43 when she had her first child. Peh is only 31.

What’s the rush, girl? Does she want the SG50 Baby Jubilee Gift so badly?

And the kid will be born in the year of the goat. That’s baaaaaa-d.

What about Code Of Law? Will she be back from her “indefinite leave of absence” after giving birth?

Or will she star in a new local Modern Family rip-off instead?

I hope Channel 5 will upload it on YouTube.

Otherwise, I’ll never see it.

- Published in The New Paper, 1 February 2015


Whaaa...? An online petition that actually worked?

$
0
0


Charis Mah, the person who started the online petition to "Keep Julien Blanc and Real Social Dynamics (RSD / RSDnation) out of Singapore", posted this update yesterday:

Response from MHA - Success!

Hi all, firstly thank you again to all who have shown your support, and apologies to those who wanted to sign but could not, because I only just realized I set the petition end date for Nov 20! (I have just opened it till the end of the year for the sake of those who want to continue to show their support.)

Secondly: I emailed the Ministry again on 19 Nov after the count surpassed 7,500, and this morning I received the following response from the Ministry of Home Affairs which was CCed to the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) and the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA):

Dear Ms Mah,
 
We refer to your email dated 19 November 2014.
 
2. Blanc has been involved in seminars in various countries that advised men to use highly abusive techniques when dating women. Violence against women or any persons is against Singapore law. The Immigration & Checkpoints Authority, in consultation with the Ministry of Social and Family Development, will not allow Mr Blanc into Singapore, especially if he is here to hold seminars or events that propagate violence against women or to participate in other objectionable activities in Singapore.
 
3. Thank you.
 
Joyce Tan
Community Partnership & Communications Group
Ministry of Home Affairs

We took a stand and we did it! Thank you everybody!



Last month, I wrote a blog post wondering why people are still starting online petitions when they never seem to achieve their stated objectives.

I brought up these examples:

It's unlikely the Revoke Han Hui Hui's Singapore Citizenship! petition (6,317 signatures) will be successful too.

So how did the Julien Blanc petition succeed when the others failed?

Well, in the first place, the petition doesn't really require anyone to do anything. I mean, it's not like the Government has to cancel Blanc's visa like Australia did.

In the second place, since other countries have also banned the guy, it's not like Singapore is going out on a limb here.

Third, is it really the petition that persuaded the Government to not allow Blanc into Singapore?

With 8,512 signatures, the petition is actually short of its 10,000 target.

Based on Ms Mah's update and the Ministry of Home Affairs reply (which doesn't mention the petition at all), it seems to me that it was Ms Mah's email - not the petition - that persuaded the Government.

Was the petition a factor? Probably.

Would the email have worked without the petition? Possibly.

My point is, this is not evidence that online petitions work, although I'm sure there are people who will take it that it is.

Or perhaps Han Hui Hui should start packing after all. Especially after the latest plagiarism allegations.

EARLIER: Online petitions: Bad news, good news for Han Hui Hui

50 shades of Baey: Run to be with him

$
0
0


This was it.

It was as if all the training was to prepare me for this moment — and I didn’t even realise it.

All the Jurong Lake Runs, the Hello Kitty Run, The Urgent Run for World Toilet Day, the Army Half Marathon— they were just foreplay for the main event on Thursday.

That was the day of my first #runwithBYK.

“Who is BYK?” you may ask.

That’s when I look at you with disgust and ask: “Do I have to explain what a ‘selfie’ is, too?”

If not for this person, many Singaporeans may not have even heard of the word “selfie”, although that may not necessarily be a bad thing.

Just like if not for Miley Cyrus, you may not know what “twerking” is and wish you didn't.

And no, I’m not talking about US selfie queen Kim Kardashian, primarily because her initials are not BYK, although like Kardashian, Singapore’s selfie king Baey Yam Keng is sort of like a reality star himself and not at all camera-shy.

And while Kardashian has a spouse who put her in his music video, Mr Baey has a spouse who put him in her play.

So the Member of Parliament for Tampines GRC not only runs but also walks the boards.

I had written so much about the man without actually meeting him that he was in danger of becoming like Hello Kitty, a disembodied construct that exists solely to provide material for this column.

So when the opportunity came to rectify this situation, I leapt at it. Or rather, I took the MRT train to Raffles Place at it.

It all started on Wednesday with a post by Mr Baey on Instagram with the hashtag #runwithBYK and an open invitation to join him in his “first ever evening run at Marina Bay tomorrow”.



His previous runs were either in the morning or in Tampines.

I couldn't join him for the morning runs because I don't usually get out of bed until lunch time.

And because I live in Choa Chu Kang, I avoid going to the eastern part of Singapore since the people there tend to look down on us “westerners” as evidenced by the West Sucks Story Tumblr.

Also, Tampines is very far.

But Thursday evening at Marina Bay was the perfect time and place.

Next, I had to decide what to wear.

My 2014 TNP Big Walk tee had shrunk in the wrong places and my ST Run At The Hub tee makes me look fat.

In the end, I settled on a tight bluish grey Renoma tee which shows off my moobs.

Then I had another problem.

The Instagram said to meet at the Raffles statue by the river, but I Googled it and found there were two Raffles statues in the area.

As if my life wasn’t already difficult enough. Damn you, Sir Stamford, if you ruin this day for me.

So I took a big chance and went to the statue nearest the river.



I was 10 minutes early and saw another guy in running gear hanging around the statue. Was he here for the #runwithBYK too?

That meant I wouldn’t have Mr Baey to myself. My heart sank.

Nursing my disappointment, I walked as far away as I could from the interloper while keeping the statue in sight.

A few minutes later, I saw Mr Baey talking to my new enemy and immediately went to make my presence known.

As I laid eyes on the MP's lean, tanned body in a black Adidas tank top, I finally saw in the flesh why I once called him the Sexiest Man Alive.

He recognised me and said: “S M Ong.”

I could die now.

Shaking my hand, he said: “You look better in person than in your photos.”

I know, right? Not everyone can be as photogenic as His Selfieness.

Then the most coincidental thing in the universe happened. The other guy (the interloper, my new enemy) recognised me and I recognised him.

We used to work at MediaCorp together. He was a producer-director for Singapore’s groundbreaking sitcom Under One Roof, which I also wrote for. I haven’t seen him in about a decade.

He, too, had never met Mr Baey before and decided to join the #runwithBYK after seeing the post on Instagram.

Who knew #runwithBYK could reunite old acquaintances better than Facebook?

Suddenly, Mr Baey seemed like the third wheel.

But after some quick catching-up, it was time to run.

From the Raffles statue, Mr Baey led us past the Esplanade, over the Helix Bridge, past Gardens By The Bay to the Marina Barrage where we took a break. That was over 3km.

Along the way, we were approaching an intimidating flight of stairs when I whined: “Stairs?

Mr Baey immediately changed direction and we ran up a gentle slope instead. He is considerate like that.

During the break at Marina Barrage, I explained I was still recovering from a 14km run at MacRitchie Reservoir the previous day, so I wasn’t in the best of shape. I think they believed me.

After we took the all-important selfies to commemorate the occasion, it was time to run back, this time round the other side of the bay past Marina Bay Sands and Clifford Pier.

But I lagged so far behind the other two that at One Fullerton, I completely lost sight of them in the evening rush-hour crowd.

Despite all the Jurong Lake Runs, the Hello Kitty Run, The Urgent Run and the Army Half Marathon, I couldn’t keep up with BYK.

Would I see him again?

I figured if I could find my way back to the Raffles statue, I still had a chance.

As I wandered through the maze of tunnels and bridges, I must have stumbled onto a shortcut because I suddenly see Mr Baey and my ex-colleague crossing the road in front of Victoria Theatre.



The road was so busy, I was worried they would be killed by oncoming traffic. That would certainly affect Mr Baey’s chances for re-election.

But I caught up with them and we made it across the road alive.

Alas, it was time to say goodbye — but not before I took one final selfie with the selfie king.

Who knows if we’ll ever meet again?

We’ll always have Instagram.

Here’s looking at you, BYK.

Valentine’s Day is this week. Should I get him something?

- Published in The New Paper, 8 February 2015



EARLIER: A Singaporean for Sexiest Man Alive?

They grow up so fast: 10 years of Chinese New Year clothes

$
0
0
2005


2006


2007


2008


2009


2010


2011


2012


2013


2014

'Annoying' but 'newsworthy': Tweets about AHPETC debate in Parliament

$
0
0







































































Skip Chinese New Year? I tried

$
0
0


In 2001, US author John Grisham wrote a No. 1 New York Times bestseller called Skipping Christmas.

For those who have never heard of Grisham, his books were like the Fifty Shades Of Grey of the 90s. Only instead of writing about journalists having kinky sex with their interview subjects (happens to me all the time), Grisham wrote mostly about lawyers. So it was more like Fifty Shades Of Grey Suits.

But Skipping Christmas was not about lawyers, so it was quite a departure for Grisham. As the title suggests, the short novel is about a married American couple who decide to skip Christmas.

That is, to forgo all the annual rituals that come with the holiday — the shopping, the tree, the decorating, the cards, the fruitcake and so on.

As someone who routinely doesn’t do any of those things (except shopping), I was surprised you could write a whole book about not doing those things.

Why put up decorations and get a tree when you have to get rid of them in a couple of weeks anyway?

But Skipping Christmas was not only a book — it also became a 2004 movie called Christmas With The Kranks, starring Tim Allen and Jamie Lee Curtis.



Let’s just say it wasn’t exactly Lord Of The Rings.

Then this year, I finally got it. I finally understood why it was so difficult for the fictional American couple to skip Christmas.

It would be like me trying to skip Chinese New Year.

I have more or less managed to skip everything else.

Over the years, I have trained my family (my wife and two teenage kids) not to get sucked in by all these fake “holidays” promoted by the retail industrial complex — Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day and the increasingly popular Halloween.

No presents. No cards. No overpriced “holiday” restaurant meals.



But I do allow cakes and presents on birthdays, and my wife gets the set lunch at Jack’s Place on our wedding anniversary. But that was it.

We, as a family, do not participate in any superfluous holiday ritual.

Except for Chinese New Year.

It should be called the Festival of Queues, with all the Singaporeans queueing for bak kwa and to buy Toto for the annual Hongbao Draw.



Even I couldn’t escape queuing for new notes at the bank to stuff into the hongbao.

But why do I need to give hongbao anyway, much less use new notes?

Just because everyone is doing it? Because it’s tradition? For good luck? Courtesy?

One year, I decided not to give out hongbao at all when visiting relatives.

Call me stingy. Call me a CNY Scrooge. I don’t care.

After the CPF changes, I’m still not sure exactly how much or how little I can withdraw from my account when I turn 55 in six years, so cash flow is no small consideration.



Not everyone can work at DBS Bank and get a $1,000 SG50 hongbao.

I should be practical and secure enough to withstand some name-calling and gossipy whispers behind my back.

But my mother wasn’t. I later found out that to save face, my mother gave out hongbao on my behalf, which kind of defeated the purpose.

I think too many of us care too much about saving face (instead of saving money). So it was back to queueing for new notes to stuff into the hongbao the next year.

Chinese New Year is one reason I miss full-time national service (NS).

At least during my NS, I could volunteer for CNY duty to avoid visiting relatives and lie to my mother that it was my unreasonable Encik who forced me to be on duty.

So I had two very restful Chinese New Years, thanks to NS.

Without NS, the only way for me to get out of visiting relatives now is to go on an actual holiday overseas during the holiday, which indeed, some of my relatives have done.



Hey, wait a minute. Were they avoiding me?

I wonder, is it possible to not get sucked into the CNY industrial complex without leaving the country?

In other words, could I skip Chinese New Year?

I could lie to my mother that the family was going on a holiday.

No hongbao, no oranges, no shopping for new clothes and no reunion dinner.

My wife was all for it.

“Let’s do it!” she said.

But alas, my damn kids protested.

My son claimed he actually enjoyed seeing our relatives once a year.

My daughter said: “I have to go visit the food and the hongbao.”

Sure, it’s all profit for them, but it’s just dollar bills flying out of my wallet for me.

So not this year, but maybe next year.

And if not next year, then the year after that.

But someday — I don’t know when — I’m going to write a book called Skipping Chinese New Year and it will be autobiographical.

New York Times bestsellers list, here I come!

- Published in The New Paper, 15 February 2015

Video: I want to stop shop theft like the 'yan dao' cop too

Why does Chinese New Year seem so quiet this year?

$
0
0
Chinese New Year will be here tomorrow.

Finally!

As I've written before (and got flak for it), I'm no fan of Chinese New Year.

But I've noticed that this year, ithe celebrations seem relatively muted (for which I'm grateful).

Makansutra's KF Seetoh also made a similar observation on Facebook:




Some attribute the lack of "CNY spirit" to businesses not wanting to pay the royalties for playing CNY songs. The flaw in the theory is that this requirement has been around for years.

This Sunday Times report is from 4 Feb 2007:

Copyright rules mean even small shops & eateries must pay up if they want to play CNY songs
Did you spot me in the Stop Shop Theft video by the Singapore Police Force?
Pay - if you want to play Chinese New Year songs in your shop, restuarant or hair salon.

This is even if you do so for a short period during the run-up to the celebration. That's the stand of the Composers and Authors Society of Singapore (Compass), a non-profit organisation which protects the copyright interests of composers, authors and publishers of musical works.

It collects, & distributes, royalities to them.

Compass spokesman Gerald Ng says a fee must be paid "whether they play music 2 weeks in a year during Chinese New Year or the whole year round".

An annual licence is required to broadcast music. And the rule doesn't just apply to nightclubs or KTV lounges. It also affects all commercial outlets that play recorded music - even neighbourhood stores, coffee shops and hair salons.

The cost can range from $195 for a small eatery with 32 seats to about $16,000 for a large mall with 20,000 sq m of pedestrian space.

An operator of an average-sized coffee shop with 90 seats will have to pay $380, or risk a fine not exceeding $20,000, a jail term of up to 2 years, or both.

How strictly does Compass enforce this? I don't know, but I'm unaware of any clampdown this year or last year. So why should it be a factor now?

There also isn't a recession (at least not yet) like in 2009, so you can't blame the economy.



My wife says it's because the Year of the Goat (or Sheep or Ram or Yak, whatever) isn't very popular, unlike say the Year of the Dragon or Horse.

Yes, it does seem to get more festive when it's the Year of the Dragon, but that doesn't mean it gets less festive in other years — it's just the usual level of festivities.

My own theory is that the this year's CNY feels rather subdued because it comes too late in the calender year — Feb 19, ie tomorrow.

In the years when CNY was in January, I have seen retailers quickly switch their Christmas decorations to CNY decorations even before December was over to cram as much pre-CNY promotion as they could in the few weeks they had.

But when you have more than seven long weeks from Christmas to CNY (with Valentine's Day in between), there is less urgency to go all out for CNY — and hence, less impact.

In fact, CNY has never come this late in the year since 1996, the last time the holiday fell on Feb 19. Anyone remember how low key it was then?

Or more recently in 2007 when CNY was on Feb 18, just a day earlier?

For an even later date, you have to go all the way back to 1985 when the first day of CNY was Feb 20.

Check out the chart below from www.chinesenewyears.info.

YearChinese New Year DateAnimal Sign
19301930-01-29Horse (1930-01-29—1931-02-16)
19311931-02-17Sheep (1931-02-17—1932-02-05)
19321932-02-06Monkey (1932-02-06—1933-01-25)
19331933-01-26Rooster (1933-01-26—1934-02-13)
19341934-02-14Dog (1934-02-14—1935-02-03)
19351935-02-04Pig (1935-02-04—1936-01-23)
19361936-01-24Rat (1936-01-24—1937-02-10)
19371937-02-11Ox (1937-02-11—1938-01-30)
19381938-01-31Tiger (1938-01-31—1939-02-18)
19391939-02-19Rabbit (1939-02-19—1940-02-07)
19401940-02-08Dragon (1940-02-08—1941-01-26)
19411941-01-27Snake (1941-01-27—1942-02-14)
19421942-02-15Horse (1942-02-15—1943-02-03)
19431943-02-04Sheep (1943-02-04—1944-01-24)
19441944-01-25Monkey (1944-01-25—1945-02-12)
19451945-02-13Rooster (1945-02-13—1946-01-31)
19461946-02-01Dog (1946-02-01—1947-01-21)
19471947-01-22Pig (1947-01-22—1948-02-09)
19481948-02-10Rat (1948-02-10—1949-01-28)
19491949-01-29Ox (1949-01-29—1950-02-16)
19501950-02-17Tiger (1950-02-17—1951-02-05)
19511951-02-06Rabbit (1951-02-06—1952-01-26)
19521952-01-27Dragon (1952-01-27—1953-02-13)
19531953-02-14Snake (1953-02-14—1954-02-02)
19541954-02-03Horse (1954-02-03—1955-01-23)
19551955-01-24Sheep (1955-01-24—1956-02-11)
19561956-02-12Monkey (1956-02-12—1957-01-30)
19571957-01-31Rooster (1957-01-31—1958-02-17)
19581958-02-18Dog (1958-02-18—1959-02-07)
19591959-02-08Pig (1959-02-08—1960-01-27)
19601960-01-28Rat (1960-01-28—1961-02-14)
19611961-02-15Ox (1961-02-15—1962-02-04)
19621962-02-05Tiger (1962-02-05—1963-01-24)
19631963-01-25Rabbit (1963-01-25—1964-02-12)
19641964-02-13Dragon (1964-02-13—1965-02-01)
19651965-02-02Snake (1965-02-02—1966-01-20)
19661966-01-21Horse (1966-01-21—1967-02-08)
19671967-02-09Sheep (1967-02-09—1968-01-29)
19681968-01-30Monkey (1968-01-30—1969-02-16)
19691969-02-17Rooster (1969-02-17—1970-02-05)
19701970-02-06Dog (1970-02-06—1971-01-26)
19711971-01-27Pig (1971-01-27—1972-02-14)
19721972-02-15Rat (1972-02-15—1973-02-02)
19731973-02-03Ox (1973-02-03—1974-01-22)
19741974-01-23Tiger (1974-01-23—1975-02-10)
19751975-02-11Rabbit (1975-02-11—1976-01-30)
19761976-01-31Dragon (1976-01-31—1977-02-17)
19771977-02-18Snake (1977-02-18—1978-02-06)
19781978-02-07Horse (1978-02-07—1979-01-27)
19791979-01-28Sheep (1979-01-28—1980-02-15)
19801980-02-16Monkey (1980-02-16—1981-02-04)
19811981-02-05Rooster (1981-02-05—1982-01-24)
19821982-01-25Dog (1982-01-25—1983-02-12)
19831983-02-13Pig (1983-02-13—1984-02-01)
19841984-02-02Rat (1984-02-02—1985-02-19)
19851985-02-20Ox (1985-02-20—1986-02-08)
19861986-02-09Tiger (1986-02-09—1987-01-28)
19871987-01-29Rabbit (1987-01-29—1988-02-16)
19881988-02-17Dragon (1988-02-17—1989-02-05)
19891989-02-06Snake (1989-02-06—1990-01-26)
19901990-01-27Horse (1990-01-27—1991-02-14)
19911991-02-15Sheep (1991-02-15—1992-02-03)
19921992-02-04Monkey (1992-02-04—1993-01-22)
19931993-01-23Rooster (1993-01-23—1994-02-09)
19941994-02-10Dog (1994-02-10—1995-01-30)
19951995-01-31Pig (1995-01-31—1996-02-18)
19961996-02-19Rat (1996-02-19—1997-02-06)
19971997-02-07Ox (1997-02-07—1998-01-27)
19981998-01-28Tiger (1998-01-28—1999-02-15)
19991999-02-16Rabbit (1999-02-16—2000-02-04)
20002000-02-05Dragon (2000-02-05—2001-01-23)
20012001-01-24Snake (2001-01-24—2002-02-11)
20022002-02-12Horse (2002-02-12—2003-01-31)
20032003-02-01Sheep (2003-02-01—2004-01-21)
20042004-01-22Monkey (2004-01-22—2005-02-08)
20052005-02-09Rooster (2005-02-09—2006-01-28)
20062006-01-29Dog (2006-01-29—2007-02-17)
20072007-02-18Pig (2007-02-18—2008-02-06)
20082008-02-07Rat (2008-02-07—2009-01-25)
20092009-01-26Ox (2009-01-26—2010-02-13)
20102010-02-14Tiger (2010-02-14—2011-02-02)
20112011-02-03Rabbit (2011-02-03—2012-01-22)
20122012-01-23Dragon (2012-01-23—2013-02-09)
20132013-02-10Snake (2013-02-10—2014-01-30)
20142014-01-31Horse (2014-01-31—2015-02-18)
20152015-02-19Sheep (2015-02-19—2016-02-07)
20162016-02-08Monkey (2016-02-08—2017-01-27)
20172017-01-28Rooster (2017-01-28—2018-02-15)
20182018-02-16Dog (2018-02-16—2019-02-04)
20192019-02-05Pig (2019-02-05—2020-01-24)
20202020-01-25Rat (2020-01-25—2021-02-11)
20212021-02-12Ox (2021-02-12—2022-01-31)
20222022-02-01Tiger (2022-02-01—2023-01-21)
20232023-01-22Rabbit (2023-01-22—2024-02-09)
20242024-02-10Dragon (2024-02-10—2025-01-28)
20252025-01-29Snake (2025-01-29—2026-02-16)
20262026-02-17Horse (2026-02-17—2027-02-05)
20272027-02-06Sheep (2027-02-06—2028-01-25)
20282028-01-26Monkey (2028-01-26—2029-02-12)
20292029-02-13Rooster (2029-02-13—2030-02-02)
20302030-02-03Dog (2030-02-03—2031-01-22)

I think I prefer CNY to come before Valentine's Day, so that we can get it over with as quickly possible. This year, it already feels like CNY has been going on forever.

Like I said, Chinese New Year will be here tomorrow.

Finally!

EARLIER: Skip Chinese New Year? I tried


Still a jerk? Glenn Ong versus Nicholas Lee (and VR Man)

$
0
0


Glenn Ong again?

Yes, I’m aware that I wrote about the former radio DJ just last month.

Can I help it if last week, his second ex-wife Jamie Yeo revealed in a magazine interview that their 2009 break-up was her fault and that she was “really sorry”?

That is a game-changing revelation about Ong, who has provided this column with so much material since he announced his separation from Yeo on his radio show six years ago on Valentine's Day. How romantic.

Then, less than two weeks later, he announced he was dating another DJ, Jean Danker.

There was speculation that Ong was already “dating” Danker during his marriage to Yeo, leading to the split.

Since Ong already had one failed marriage with another DJ, the late Kate Reyes, where Yeo herself was alleged to be the third party, it was easy to jump to the conclusion that he was the bad guy.

Or “scum-worthy”, as radio DJ Joe Augustin put it in 2001 after Ong’s split with Reyes.



Augustin and Ong must have since kissed and made up as Augustin was Ong's last on-air partner before Ong quit MediaCorp last month to become a director at some consulting firm called Cirvis.

That's 50 Shades Of Glenn for ya.

But now Yeo has set the record straight — not about whether she was responsible for breaking up Ong’s first marriage, but about being responsible for breaking up his second marriage and her first.

In response to Yeo's bombshell, Ong, 45, told The New Paper last week:
“Maybe this will answer the questions of a lot of people who blamed me for the split. I bore the brunt of it for years, with netizens calling me a jerk and saying I had cheated on her and was the cause of it all.”
On behalf of all those netizens, I concede that they might have been wrong to say Ong cheated on Yeo - but the jury is still out on whether he is a jerk.

We need a character witness.

I know! Let's get Nicholas Lee.

The actor first came to fame in the 90s as a cast member of Singapore’s first sitcom, Under One Roof.



But today, he is probably better known for his recent online spat with Ong over another local show on Channel 5, a futuristic sci-fi drama called 2025.



It stars Lim Kay Tong, who coincidentally will also appear in another production with a year as the title, playing Mr Lee Kuan Yew in the upcoming movie, 1965.



How does Lim travel from 10 years in the future to 50 years in the past? In a hot tub time machine, of course.



So is 2025 any good?

Here is Glenn Ong’s Twitter review:


I have to disagree with him here.

VR Man was not funny.

Sure, the short clips of the 1998 series starring James Lye on YouTube are unintentionally hilarious.



But if you ever sit through a complete episode, you will realise it’s no laughing matter. You’ll wish for a hot tub time machine to get back the 60 minutes you wasted watching the show.

But I wasn’t the only who took umbrage at Ong’s tweet.

2025 happens to be produced by Nicholas Lee’s pornographically-named production company, XXX Studios.

In response to Ong dissing his show, Lee retorted: “Spends his entire career talking cock. Even after quitting still talks shit. Fuck Glenn Ong.”

I think it's safe to say Lee thinks Ong is a jerk.



I’m not sure whose side to take in this mini feud as I have been both a critic and a producer of criticised local shows.

Like Ong, I have been frustrated by how unwatchable local shows can be. We haters gonna hate.

On the other hand, I applaud Lee for standing up for his show and the people in his company who worked so hard to produce 2025, although he could’ve used fewer expletives.

As Lee told The Straits Times: “The show represents the collective efforts of over 200 Singaporeans over 14 months under very challenging circumstances.”



All this publicity could’ve even improved the show’s ratings last night.

You know who really should be angry with Ong? The people who worked so hard to produce VR Man all those years ago.

How dare Ong compare VR Man to 2025? What an insult to VR Man.

At least people are still talking about VR Man more than a decade later. You think anyone will even remember 2025 in 2025?

I’m going to be a jerk and say no.

Lim Kay Tong may be Mr Lee Kuan Yew, but he is no James Lye.

- Published in The New Paper, 22 February 2015



EARLIER:

Why VR Man will outlive us all

Why I'm afraid to bump into Glenn Ong

UPDATE: Another 'online spat': Glenn Ong versus... me?

Another 'online spat': Glenn Ong versus... me?

$
0
0
I guess this has been a long time coming.

In respose to my column on Sunday about his 'online spat' with Nicholas Lee, Glenn Ong tweeted this today:



He also went on Instagram:



And tweeted:





Do I finally get to be in an 'online spat' with a local celebrity?

As Dolly from Under One Roof used to say, so exciting!

So I tweeted back to Glenn:



He replied:





I corrected him:



Understandable mistake. Glenn probably confused Say Say Say with Richie's Say You Say Me.





Then a sudden change of heart:





And just like that, Glenn's "online spat" with me was over.

Not exactly the thriller one had hoped.



EARLIER: Still a jerk? Glenn Ong versus Nicholas Lee (and VR Man)

What am I doing in The Real Singapore?

$
0
0


So unreal.

I have to admit, I like The Real Singapore (TRS)... on Facebook.

Ooh, will someone make a police report against me for sedition?

TRS has been in the spotlight recently after The New Paper broke the news that two people believed to be behind the socio-political website were arrested under the Sedition Act for posting remarks online “that could promote ill will and hostility among the different races in Singapore” and are released on bail.

In the wake of the news, Yahoo Singapore reported that the arrests received “more cheers than jeers online”.

Too bad the same thing can’t be said for the Neil Patrick Harris-hosted Oscar show last Sunday.

But one TRS fan tweeted support with the hashtag #RIPfreedomofspeech, even though the website appears to be carrying on as usual as if nothing has happened. So let’s hold off on the “freedom of speech” eulogies for now, shall we?



After all, this is the website that survived an online petition to shut it down last year. What’s a couple of police arrests? (Waves hand dismissively.)

The petition alleged:
“TRS has been posting articles which incite fear, hatred and xenophobia. On many occasions, it has also plagiarised work and altered content without the initial owner's explicit permission.”

The “inciting xenophobia” part is a bit ironic as Mr Brown pointed out on Twitter about the two arrested: “One of them is actually a foreigner. Quick, TRS! Say something xenophobic about FTs!”

So why do I “like” TRS on Facebook if it posts articles that “incite fear, hatred and xenophobia”?

Because it doesn't post only articles that “incite fear, hatred and xenophobia”.

For example, on Friday, TRS posted an article about how sleeping too much could raise the risk of stroke.

Sure, the article (copied and pasted from CBSNews.com) may incite fear of sleeping too much, but I found the article particularly pertinent because I really sleep a lot.

On the same day, TRS also shared the viral photo of The Dress That Broke The Internet because people couldn’t agree on what colour it is.

Even Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong shared it on Facebook.




Like the PM, I say it’s white and gold, but since Mindef is making it more difficult to get the Gold Award in the new IPPT format, the dress could just be white and silver.

So you see, TRS isn't all about inciting fear, hatred and xenophobia. It also alerts me to the latest hooey that netizens are obsessing about.

Sure, I get the occasional obscenity-laden video of commuters fighting on public transport, but that's just a bonus.




Actually, I have a more personal reason for following TRS on Facebook.

Remember how the “Shut down TRS” online petition also alleged that TRS “plagiarised work” without the owner’s permission?

I am the owner of one such work.

Last November, TRS took one of my blog posts and reproduced the whole thing on its website.



It wasn’t exactly plagiarism since TRS did credit me as the author and provided a link to my blog, but TRS never asked for my permission.

I wasn’t sure how I felt or what to do about it.

On the one hand, I don’t want anyone to mistakenly think that I am a voluntary contributor to TRS.

On the other hand, I was flattered that TRS deemed my blog post worthy enough to reproduce without permission, even though my blog post about the inefficacy of online petitions didn't incite hatred for anything except perhaps online petitions.

Hey, maybe TRS reproduced my blog post because it’s no fan of online petitions too.

But do I really want to be associated with a website that even Mr Brown thinks is xenophobic?

On the other hand, according to SimilarWeb.com, TRS has an estimated 2.9 million monthly visits, which is 300 times more than what my blog gets.

Getting that kind of web traffic is like winning the Hong Bao Draw in blogger terms.



Not that my blog got any visits from the TRS link. But the potential readership!

(Even tnp.sg has only 1.2 million monthly visits, but straitstimes.com has 8.6 million.)

Maybe I should be more upset I’m not getting a piece of TRS’ ad revenue they’re supposedly bragging about.

In the end, I did nothing about TRS stealing my content — but I’m keeping an eye on the website to see if it does it again.

Is it too late for me to make a police report since people seem to be making police reports about all sorts of things nowadays?

Just let me take a nap first.

- Published in The New Paper, 1 March 2015



Dear S M Ong and TNP

Thank you for the article and a Return kind gesture to you
Saw S M Ong's handsome cartoon face on his page 'What am I doing here?'(Sunday/ TNP 1/3/2015) and got hooked to his debate on the color of his dress article (Big news as every Press and even TV News broadcast it!) though I of course , does not wear one (as a man).

As a contributor for your Forum 'Your Views' page throughout the years (You can check my TNP's account) I would like to thank TNP especially SM Ong for continue supporting 1 of my article on the 'Yellow Ribbon' Beauty Queen Boomz by suggesting to 'Tie that Yellow Ribbon round her' and thus, render my return support for his article in these 2 ways:

1. Although you state that you are not a contributor of TRS by choice but your quote of 'WHAT am I doing here?' (TNP 1/3/2015) has kindly supported the title of my 'World Heritage cum Arts Treasure' (WHAT) exhibition for SG 50. (Yes, Singaporean's are famous for asking What? What? and more What?) and would thus like to include you in my SMC (Social Media Consultancy). Don't worry, the police will not be looking for you as even the National Leaders have joined my club!

2. I am also very impressed that Ong can turn the perspective of physical White and Gold color into another mental perspective of Gold representing army's physical fitness award, which is hard to achieve and settle for Silver instead. We all know which Political Party 'White color' stands for and would like to confirm and double confirm that Gold color here stands for Singapore's 50th 'Gold-en jubilee' which is also part of my WHAT project. (So kindly don't change PM's wise choice color. We can also consider making it Singapore's official 'dress code' color for 2015. Ha!)

Will email you on WHAT project launch date and Happy Golden Jubilee Yr 2015 to TNP
Victor Yap
Principal Consultant of Social Media Consultancy
Retired Long service award Politician

UPDATE: What one ex-frogman thinks of Jack Neo's NDU movie

$
0
0


A year ago, right after Jack Neo announced his third Ah Boys To Men movie, which would be about naval divers, I wrote a column about how at least one former naval diver was not happy about it.

Here is a quote from my friend, Patrick the ex-frogman, who is clearly no fan of Neo:
I cannot express enough Hokkien, Teochew and Cantonese swear words at my disappointment with this arrangement to collaborate on this misadventure…

We’ll end up looking like Ah Kwa Peng like the rest of his shitty movies.

This arsehole has no clue as to what directing a movie requires.

Pat even wrote a message to Neo on Facebook:

stay away from NDU!!! we'd rather remain the "the silent professionals".

all your other SAF themed movies have made a mockery of themselves & ended up with ah kwa peng product.

we've worked too damn hard to earn our status for you to stuff it up- you cannot imagine what we've endured physically mentally to earn the privilege to wear a piece of steel on our chest.

you really want it then you go thru the whole course first YOURSELF!!!

I'm an old school NDU diver from the days before NSF divers came thru & even did a small part in the original series with zoe etc- what a waste of our time-so STAY AWAY FROM NDU.

we're not here for you to make money & mockery of.

I don't think Neo ever replied to Pat.



Pat was also upset with me for mentioning his fondness for knives in my column, and Pat is not someone you want to be upset with you. (You know, because of the knives thing.)

Fast forward to 10 months later, I chatted with Pat on Facebook and he told me my column didn't go unnoticed:

Lol we stirred a tsunami bro - navy command via Ndu commander got in touch with me, but I got my point across so to speak hehehe

I asked him what he thought of the movie trailer, which had just came out then. His response:

Muffled sniggers



Pat finally saw the movie a few days ago, so I asked him what he thought of the final product.

His uncharacteristically near-diplomatic reply:

at least jack portrayed our training realistically less opsec limitations

Storyline/ human interest side is cliche at best as expected from jack

Full of product endorsements like stickers on an F1 racing car lol

New navy cadence is catchy

Overall I'd give 7/10

Heaps better than his previous ah boys movies. Acting not too bad, they didn't make us look like clowns- thanks guys (actors)

Reckon I'd buy the DVD when it comes out too, brought back a few memories of home and the brotherhood

But Friggin 30 mins of adverts before the movie started for products endorsed within nearly numbed my arse lol

Looks like jack managed to pull a rabbit out the hat, but I can only imagine with a tremendous effort and support from the unit and the navy

Then he added:

wonder how it would have turned out if i didn't kick over the shit bucket and he had free reign with his artistic liberties?

i still don't trust the fucker - never will

I said his response is quite positive compared to his earlier reaction. He replied:

its got nothing to do with being pos/neg- i call a duck a duck - no punches pulled and no regrets or apologies for my challenge to jack.

he produced as i expected, nothing new or above board from him

the unit's mystique to the public made the movie, along with the admirable effort by the ah boys not to make NDU look like clowns.

this was "strongly emphasised" upon them when they were introduced to us prior to starting filming and frankie's training sessions

jack's humour was directed appropriately at our local colloqiuism.

the soundtrack was upbeat and surprisingly fresh to listen to for once, something to call our own, instead of rehash of USA cadences

his HK actor is still unpolished but has potential

I haven't seen the movie, so I don't know what Pat is talking about.



Pat may have cut Neo some slack, but it seems Pat still hasn't completely forgiven me for mentioning his knives.

so my knives remain sheathed for now LOL !! idiot for bringing that up you LMAO!!!

Uh... hooya?



EARLIER: Dear Jack Neo, you don't wanna mess with this frogman

What if Singapore leaders were like Indonesian vice-president?

$
0
0


From Channel NewsAsia:
Mr Jusuf Kalla, Vice-President of Indonesia, on Tuesday took to task neighbouring countries' complaints about the haze.

“For 11 months, they enjoyed nice air from Indonesia and they never thanked us. They have suffered because of the haze for one month and they get upset,” The Jakarta Globe quoted Mr Kalla as saying.

What if Singapore leaders were like him?

How would they respond to the recent spate of train delays?

Maybe like this:
"On other days, commuters enjoy their train rides without disruption and they never thanked us. They have suffered because of a few train delays and they get upset."



Complaints about CPF?
"Workers enjoy 80 per cent of their salary and they never thanked us. They have suffered because they're forced to save 20 per cent for retirement and they get upset."

Too many foreigners? (NTUC Secretary-General Lim Swee Say said yesterday in Parliament: "We have two-third local manpower, complemented by one-third foreign manpower.")
"Singaporeans have two-thirds of the jobs and they never thanked us. They have suffered because they have to compete with foreign workers and they get upset."

National service?
"Singaporean men enjoy most of their lives doing whatever they want and they never thanked us. They have suffered because they have to do two years' full-time NS, go for a few ICTs and pass their IPPT, which we have already made easier, and they still get upset."


Bloggers sued for defamation, fined for contempt of court?
"They enjoy blogs by Mr Brown and Xiaxue and they never thanked us. Roy Ngerng and Alex Au have suffered because they were taken to court and they get upset."

Singapore ranked the most expensive city in the world again by the Economist Intelligence Unit?
"You're welcome."

Thankfully, our leaders are not like the Indonesian VP.

Or are they?

Viewing all 691 articles
Browse latest View live